I’m sure your organization has a strategic planning process in place. If you are responsible for this process or if you are one of the key stakeholders of strategic planing and policy deployment, this note will help you examine and assess the impact of your organization’s strategic planning process. In simple words, you will understand the measures of success for strategic planning process.
Strategic Planning Process in most organizations is synonymous with annual goal setting exercise. While these two activities have certain common threads, strategic planning process isn’t restricted to just goal setting.
Strategic planning process is essentially meant to stir the organization towards its long term goals. To be more specific, strategic planning process should help organizations to organize themselves better, such as :
- Establish priorities on what organizations will accomplish in the future
- Forces organizations to make choices on what they will do and what they will not do
- Pulls the entire organization together around a single game plan for execution
- Broad outline on where resources will get allocated
Thus strategic planning process is iterative and cyclical(yearly).
In my experience, following are some of the key measures of success for a strategic planning process:
- Reliable – It is important to ensure timely completion of some of the key deliverable, such as agreement on organization goals, identification of strategies, commencement of strategic initiatives, inputs to budgetary planning, assignment of targets to individuals, etc. They are all very time critical and any delay can result in misalignment. It can even render the whole process counterproductive. Thus timely completion is one of the most important measures of success for any strategic planning process.
- Buy-in from Leaders – While the ownership of the organizational strategy and its deployment resides with top leaders, there should be acceptance among senior and mid level leaders to the strategic goals, assumptions, etc. Each leader must own the organizational goals, their accomplishment and failures. Several goals may require shared responsibility among functional/business heads apart from overall ownership. Level of participation and engagement from leaders is a good measure of their buy-in.
- Visionary Goals –The strategic planning process should facilitate a strong linkage between the organization’s core purpose of existence, its guiding principles and a compelling desire for a positive future, all looking beyond just “money-making”. All these require quality leadership time and bandwidth. A quick review of nature of goals, targets, underlying purpose, etc., can reveal its effectiveness.
- Flexible – As the process involves several functions and leaders, its likely the tasks may not happen as per schedule. It is also likely that leaders will bring in their personal style for deployment. The governance of strategic planning thus should accommodate such variations while maintaining the overall approach. In-flexible planning process show up during execution. Unrealistic goals, lack of ownership for failures, figure-pointing, delay in reporting performance, etc., are signs of inflexibility.
Integrated Plan – A good strategic plan should sync in with financial planning process. If we end-up with budgeted revenue or cost figures that don’t align with specific strategies or if we have no budgets allocated for strategic initiatives, then that’s a clear indication of misalignment. - Deployment to employees - Effective implementation of strategic plan resides in how well we can cascade the goals to various functions and there upon to individual employees. If, at least, significant roles have their performance goals & incentives linked to strategic goals, it is a good indication of well cascaded plan.
Each of the 6 measures of success would help you assess the effectiveness of the strategic planning process in your organization. However, if you wish to improve its effectiveness then you should deep dive its to each of the process tasks.
