Here are 7 problems and their impact of Poor Client centricity in B2B Sales Teams:
Free Download
Download your copy of a research report on customer experience trends in India.
There are many trend trackers to present a global perspective of CX, but there aren’t many in India. We have seen that many global trends apply to India, only with subtle difference. This report contains key observations about evolving CX trends in India.
B2B companies may find it difficult to improve NPS or client satisfaction for a variety of reasons, including:
Meeting Service Level Agreements (SLAs) in B2B organizations can be difficult for a variety of reasons, including:
If your are looking for improving ways to meet your SLAs, please contact us
Sustaining client centricity can be difficult for a number of reasons, including:
Agile enterprises are customer centric because they prioritize the needs and goals of their customers in all aspects of their business. Agile methodologies, such as Scrum and Kanban, are designed to be flexible and responsive to change, which allows organizations to quickly adapt to the evolving needs of their customers.
In an agile enterprise, customer feedback is actively sought and incorporated into product development and decision-making processes. This allows the enterprise to continuously improve and deliver products and services that align with customer needs.
Additionally, Agile enterprises also tend to have a flat organizational structure, which allows for better communication and collaboration across teams and departments, enabling them to respond more quickly to customer needs. They also tend to use cross-functional teams, which are composed of individuals from different areas of the business, such as design, development, and marketing, to work together to deliver products and services that meet customer needs.
In summary, Agile enterprises are customer centric because they prioritize the needs of their customers, actively incorporate customer feedback, and continuously improve their products and services to meet those needs.
One example of how agility helped in client centricity is the case study of a large retail bank that implemented an Agile approach to managing their customer service operations.
The bank was facing a significant challenge in maintaining high levels of customer satisfaction, as their traditional, hierarchical structure was causing delays in responding to customer complaints and requests. Additionally, the bank was facing increased competition from fintech companies that were more agile and able to respond quickly to changing customer needs.
To address these issues, the bank decided to adopt an Agile approach to managing their customer service operations. They formed cross-functional teams composed of representatives from different areas of the business, such as customer service, IT, and compliance, and implemented daily stand-up meetings to ensure that everyone was aware of the most pressing customer issues.
The bank also began actively seeking customer feedback and incorporating it into their decision-making processes. They also implemented a system for tracking customer complaints and requests in real-time, which allowed them to quickly address and resolve issues.
As a result of these changes, the bank was able to significantly improve their customer satisfaction levels and reduce their customer complaint resolution time. The agility helped them respond to the changing customer needs in a timely manner. Additionally, the bank was also able to reduce costs and improve overall efficiency, which helped them better compete with fintech companies.
This case study shows how agility helped in client centricity by allowing the bank to respond more quickly to customer needs, improve customer satisfaction, and ultimately increase competitiveness.
One example of agile client centricity in a startup is the case study of a small software development company that specializes in building custom mobile apps for small businesses.
The company had struggled to retain clients in the past because they were not able to deliver products that met the unique needs of each business. The company decided to adopt an Agile approach to software development, which allowed them to be more flexible and responsive to the evolving needs of their clients.
The company began using Scrum, an Agile methodology, to manage their software development projects. They formed small, cross-functional teams composed of developers, designers, and project managers, and held daily stand-up meetings to ensure that everyone was aware of the most pressing client needs.
The company also began actively seeking client feedback and incorporating it into their development process. They implemented a system for tracking client requests and issues in real-time, which allowed them to quickly address and resolve problems.
As a result of these changes, the company was able to significantly improve their client retention rate. Clients were happy with the product as it met their needs and the company was able to deliver the product on time and on budget. Additionally, the company was able to reduce costs and improve overall efficiency, which helped them to better compete with larger software development companies.
This case study shows how agility helped in client centricity by allowing the company to respond more quickly to client needs, improve client satisfaction and ultimately increase competitiveness.
Here are a few simple ways to start incorporating Agile principles in a non-software environment:
It is important to note that Agile is a mindset and a set of principles, not a one size fit all methodology. Therefore, it’s important to tailor the approach to the specific needs of the organization and its environment.
Inspiration is contagious like COVID!
I’m an artist at living – my work of art is my life.
– Suzuki
Be passionate about designing customer experience. Take personal interest in finer details of your product/service, even if its too insignificant for your role.
If a picture is worth 1000 words, a prototype is worth 1000 meetings. |
– Tom & David Kelley |
It’s best to create a culture to experiment, test & pilot the hypothesis rather than deliberation, debate & finalize!
Mind is never a problem, mindset is. |
– Narendra Modi |
All employees are good, any mind-block that makes someone pro or anti to a change is due to lack of clarity. Communicate beyond barriers to build strong bridges and change mindsets.
The more you engage with customers the clearer things become and the easier it is to determine what you should be doing. |
– John Russell |
Set it as your personal target to interact with at least 1 customer everyday, even if it is in an informal manner. |
_____________________________________________________ |
A little rain each day will fill the rivers to overflowing. |
– Liberian Proverb |
Leaders need to repeatedly and regularly connect with employees to emphasize the importance of customer experience. It’s not a one time fan fair event. |
_____________________________________________________ |
The customer is not always right, but they are always your customer! |
– Shep Hyken |
It doesn’t matter who’s right, any way. Not all customers will fit into ideal customer profile. This agile mindset is the starting point for customer delight. |
_____________________________________________________ |
Don’t confuse customers who are to your company with customers who are loyal to your loyalty program. |
– Sky |
Not all customers are loyal. Don’t get misled by rewards redemptions and impressions rates to gage customer engagement. |
_____________________________________________________ |
Use your good judgment in all situations. There will be no additional rules. |
– Nordstrom’s employee manual |
Processes, control measures, audits & automations should empower your employees to serve customers better and not meant to turn employees into robots that follow rule & script books. |
When your organization faces a problem, sooner or later, there will be an action plan in place to abet its elimination. The inconvenient truth about solutions is that they have long tails. Very, very few solutions actually stick. Most of them seem to be gone in months, sometimes even weeks and the problem bounces back. Yes, I’m talking about lack of permanence to the actions taken to improve performance.
There are several theories and in-depth research but, from my experience, I can say that things haven’t changed much in the last 2 decades. Whether it’s automation, change management, top-down push, leadership sponsorship, incentives, rewards, recognition or culture fix, all of them are marked by only a certain success rate.
My other post, On recurring problems, 3L 5W & what’s wrong with it… explains a method to identify system level root causes. Triangulation can be used for validation of root cause and to evaluate the effectiveness of any solution.
Triangulation is a method that involves combining multiple sources or methods to validate an analysis or its outcomes. We are used to taking a second opinion from another medical professional before committing to an incisional treatment. That is an everyday example of triangulation. The origin of triangulation dates back to Greek civilization. In the last 2 centuries, it is very commonly used in maritime navigation, civil engineering and surveying, where it relies on sound trigonometry. In fact our GPS uses this very same principle to establish the lat-long of a location. Triangulation is also a very popular research method to validate results, findings and even for monitoring the sustenance of interventions, such as social welfare initiatives.
In business while validating root causes, triangulation comes very handy. If we can validate the root cause by more than one means, it strengthens our analysis and confidence in our actions. Financially too, it makes sense, as ROI is higher.
I consider Triangulation as it can also generate new and credible findings about a situation or phenomenon and can create new ways of looking at a situation or phenomenon.
Interestingly, it helps to overcome human behavioral bias, which is the biggest spoiler when it comes to organizational deployment. It helps to explore and explain complex human behavior using a variety of methods and observers to offer a more balanced explanation for a phenomenon.
Let’s say, your organization faces unusual customer attrition. In general, you will collect and analyze data of customer activity by segments, such as customer journey, cart abandonment, milestones or events, complaints, etc to identify the reasons for customer attrition. Using triangulation, you can consider parallel methods such as customer interviews and front line employee interviews. You will independently gain insights from these 3 different methods viz., data, customer interviews & employee interviews to validate the outcomes. The results can either converge, complement or diverge from each other.
When all the three sources conclude that customer attrition is because of poor product support, we call this Convergence. That is, the results of the different methods lead to the same conclusion.
When all the three sources conclude that the customer attrition is because of poor product support, but in the customer interviews, we learn that customers prefer self-service which is a weak link of your product line, then triangulation has led to Complementarity.
When the three sources provide different outcomes, one pointing towards product support, another towards pricing and third towards customer behavior, then we are in a stalemate or Divergence. This is a concerning situation as it either highlights issues with the methods or with the very problem itself.
Depending on the objectives, triangulation can be done at different levels:
While triangulation offers many benefits, you have to be careful in selecting the right methods and planning the analysis. In general, it can consume more time that quick action mode, but will reduce failures, increase sustenance and success rates.
You can also consider triangulation for verifying sustenance of initiatives, selection of vendors or new employees
While organizations like Disney and Ritz-Carlton have the luxury to hire front line staff based on Emotional Quotient (EQ), you will agree that not all of us have that levy. More importantly, in some sectors we have to weigh other skills such as technical, financial, engineering, software than EQ during hiring. For example, in product service, B2B front line, IT solutioning, etc., it is not a pragmatic aspiration to expect employees to possess high EQ & technical know-how.
Over the years, employees have understood the importance of customer centricity. So everyone wants to be customer centric but the question really is, how? Are the specific pointers that CXOs & HODs can give to their team on what to do? Motivating & inspiring them to do so is just as good as cranking the engine. What about throttling and shifting gears?
Unfortunately, there are very few leaders who go that far. If you want your employees to emulate certain behavior everytime-everyday, you have to be very specific and take a prescriptive approach.
Here are the 8 super simple behaviors that you can demonstrate every day, in meetings, field visits, reviews, planning, brainstorming sessions, or even when you scroll down a spreadsheet. Every customer facing employee (rather every employee) can be encouraged to imbibe these practices to become customer centric that will facilitate value generation for customers & business.
We will start with the simplest and go down to the difficult ones.
If you wish to learn more about these 8 behaviors or how to create buzz around customer centricity in your organization, happy to be of help any time.