OKRNorth Star Objectives

north star objectives

North Star Objectives are a company’s core, overarching goals that guide decision-making and help ensure everyone is aligned towards a common vision. They serve as a beacon that keeps teams focused on what truly matters and helps them prioritize their efforts and resources.

An example of a global company with a North Star Objective is Amazon. Amazon’s North Star Objective is to be the world’s most customer-centric company. This objective guides all of their decision-making and drives their focus on providing the best possible experience for their customers. As a result, Amazon has built a loyal customer base and become a leader in e-commerce and cloud computing.

Steps involved in developing North Star Objectives are :

writing effective key results in OKR

Here are some pro tips for writing effective Key Results (part of OKRs – Objectives and Key Results):

By following these tips, you can write effective Key Results that support sustainable business growth and drive progress towards your company’s goals.

writing effective objectives in OKR

Here are some pro tips for writing effective Objectives (part of OKRs – Objectives and Key Results):

By following these tips, you can write effective Objectives that support sustainable business growth and drive progress towards your company’s goals.

examples of OKR

Here are some examples of OKR (Objectives and Key Results) that an organization could set:

Increase sales revenue by 20% in the next quarter

Improve employee engagement and satisfaction:

Enhance customer experience:

These are just a few examples, and OKRs can be tailored to specific organizational goals and objectives. The key is to ensure that the objectives are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART).

OKR Balance scorecard

The use of a balanced scorecard (BSC) and OKRs are not mutually exclusive, and both frameworks can provide valuable insights and benefits for organizations. The choice between using a BSC or OKRs, or using both frameworks together, will depend on the specific needs and goals of an organization.

The balanced scorecard is a performance management tool that provides a comprehensive view of an organization’s performance by measuring and tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) in four areas: financial, customer, internal processes, and learning and growth. The BSC provides a broad view of an organization’s performance and can help organizations make data-driven decisions and track progress towards their goals. strategy maps in balanced scorecards (BSCs) are indeed designed to drive performance and growth by providing alignment. Strategy maps used in BSC provide a visual representation of an organization’s strategy and help to align the organization’s efforts towards its goals. The strategy map links the organization’s vision and mission to its objectives, measures, and initiatives, providing a clear picture of how the organization will achieve its goals. By providing a visual representation of the organization’s strategy, the strategy map helps to ensure that everyone in the organization understands how their work contributes to the achievement of the organization’s goals and objectives. In this way, strategy maps play an important role in driving performance and growth by aligning the organization’s efforts towards its goals and ensuring that everyone is working towards the same objectives.

OKRs, on the other hand, are a goal-setting framework that provides a clear and specific structure for setting and tracking goals. OKRs help organizations align their efforts towards achieving specific and measurable objectives, and provide a clear understanding of what success looks like and how it will be achieved. OKRs can provide a more focused view of an organization’s performance and help organizations prioritize their efforts and resources.

In some cases, organizations may choose to use both the BSC and OKRs, leveraging the strengths of both frameworks to drive performance and growth. The BSC can provide a broad view of an organization’s performance, while OKRs can provide a more focused view and help organizations align their efforts towards specific and measurable objectives.

In summary, the choice between using a BSC or OKRs, or using both frameworks together, will depend on the specific needs and goals of an organization. Both frameworks can provide valuable insights and benefits, and organizations may choose to use both frameworks together to drive performance and growth

OKR Grading

Grading in OKRs refers to the process of evaluating the progress made towards achieving the objectives and key results set in the OKRs. The grading process helps to determine the level of success achieved and provides feedback on areas that need improvement.

Here’s how to grade OKRs:

In general, OKRs are graded on a scale of 0-1, with 0.0 indicating no progress and 1.0 indicating full attainment of the objective. Grading provides a clear picture of progress and allows individuals and teams to focus on the areas where they need to improve.

It is important to note that the grading process should be a supportive and constructive feedback mechanism, rather than a source of stress or negativity. The focus should be on learning and continuous improvement, rather than on assigning blame or punishment for not achieving objectives.

OKRs can be graded at different frequencies, depending on the nature of the objectives and the goals of the organization. Here are two common approaches to grading OKRs:

End of cycle grading: OKRs are graded at the end of each quarter or half-year, after the set timeframe for achieving the objectives has passed. This approach is suitable for objectives that are long-term or have a significant impact on the organization and its operations.

Weekly or monthly grading: OKRs are graded on a regular basis, such as every week or every month. This approach is suitable for objectives that are more short-term or have a smaller impact on the organization. This approach provides more frequent feedback and allows individuals and teams to adjust their focus and priorities on an ongoing basis.

Ultimately, the frequency of grading should be determined by the nature of the objectives and the goals of the organization. Both end of cycle and frequent grading have their benefits, and the approach that is chosen should align with the overall strategy and goals of the organization.

Grading OKRs too often can lead to several problems, including:

In general, it is important to ensure that the grading process is supportive, constructive, and focused on continuous improvement, rather than on punishment or blame. This can be achieved by setting clear criteria for grading, involving employees in the grading process, and providing regular feedback and coaching to help individuals and teams achieve their goals

Sign-up for collaborat newsletter